Spagat v. Mahin
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Underwood
Plaintiff Spagat purchased wall-to-wall carpeting from plaintiff Polk Bros., Inc. at a price of $607.65 and was charged an additional $30.38 as tax pursuant to the Use Tax Act (Ill.Rev.Stat. 1967, ch. 120, pars. 439.2 et seq.) A charge of $120.33 for installation was not subjected to any tax.
Plaintiffs, each suing individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, sought a declaratory judgment that the sale of wall-to-wall carpeting does not constitute a sale at retail and is therefore properly taxable under the Service Use Tax Act (Ill.Rev.Stat. 1967, ch. 120, pars. 439.31 et…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Central Television Service, Inc. v. IsaacsIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- Oscar L. Paris Co. v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Velten & Pulver, Inc. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by20 opinions
- Richard's Tire Co. v. ZehnderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Marsh v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Terrace Carpet Co. v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Schawk, Inc. v. ZehnderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Quotron Systems Inc. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.