Legal Opinion

Spagat v. Mahin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1971No. 44176PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Underwood

Plaintiff Spagat purchased wall-to-wall carpeting from plaintiff Polk Bros., Inc. at a price of $607.65 and was charged an additional $30.38 as tax pursuant to the Use Tax Act (Ill.Rev.Stat. 1967, ch. 120, pars. 439.2 et seq.) A charge of $120.33 for installation was not subjected to any tax.

Plaintiffs, each suing individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, sought a declaratory judgment that the sale of wall-to-wall carpeting does not constitute a sale at retail and is therefore properly taxable under the Service Use Tax Act (Ill.Rev.Stat. 1967, ch. 120, pars. 439.31 et…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central Television Service, Inc. v. IsaacsIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Oscar L. Paris Co. v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Velten & Pulver, Inc. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Dow Chemical Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Richard's Tire Co. v. ZehnderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. Marsh v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Terrace Carpet Co. v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Schawk, Inc. v. ZehnderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Quotron Systems Inc. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API