Legal Opinion

Harry Gregory v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 17, 1951No. 11356_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.'

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel;

And it appearing that the Findings of Fact by the District Judge are in accordance with the stipulation of the parties-herein, and that his -Conclusions of Law correctly apply the legal principles applicable thereto ;

It is ordered that, for the reasons given-by the District Judge in said Conclusions-of Law and upon the authority of Aeronautical Lodge v. Campbell, 337 U.S. 521, 69 S.Ct. 1287, 93 L.Ed. 513, and Raulins v. Memphis Union Station Co., 6 Cir., 168 F.2d 466, the judgment of the District Court, herein…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 727 v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Raulins v. Memphis Union Station Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  3. Gregory v. Louisville & N. R. R.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Derlyn E. Moe v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Sularz v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  3. Bostian v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  4. Sularz v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API