Legal Opinion
Sularz v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 10, 1958No. 15770PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHES, Circuit Judge.
The purpose of this action is to enforce the claim of a veteran to reemployment rights under Section 8 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, 54 Stat. 885, 890, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 459.1 More precisely, plaintiff seeks to compel his. employer, Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault. *123Ste. Marie Railroad Co., for the sake of brevity called Company, to give him a seniority listing on the carman mechanic’s roster at the repair track immediately below that of one Koniar (who immediately preceded plaintiff on the carman’s helper roster on the date plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hewitt v. System Federation No. 152 of Ry. Employees' Dept. of American Federation of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Raulins v. Memphis Union Station Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Lesher v. P. R. Mallory & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Nevins v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sularz v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958