State v. McKenney
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
Complaints charged the defendant with violations of two Rochester ordinances on November 17, 1983. See RSA 625:9, V. On January 23, 1984, the Rochester District Court (Cooper, J.) found defendant guilty of each charge, imposed one fine and suspended another. The court then denied defendant’s motion to appeal to the superior court, apparently on the basis of the latest amendment of RSA 502-A:12 (Supp. 1983). That amendment took effect on January 1, 1984, and eliminated appeals from the district court to the superior court following convictions in violation cases, subject to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Woart v. WinnickSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1826
- Smith v. SampsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- State v. TheodosopoulosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. KomisarekSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HeathSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- State v. HoflandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008