Legal Opinion

State v. McKenney

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 1, 1985No. 84-086PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

Complaints charged the defendant with violations of two Rochester ordinances on November 17, 1983. See RSA 625:9, V. On January 23, 1984, the Rochester District Court (Cooper, J.) found defendant guilty of each charge, imposed one fine and suspended another. The court then denied defendant’s motion to appeal to the superior court, apparently on the basis of the latest amendment of RSA 502-A:12 (Supp. 1983). That amendment took effect on January 1, 1984, and eliminated appeals from the district court to the superior court following convictions in violation cases, subject to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. Woart v. WinnickSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1826
  3. Smith v. SampsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  4. State v. TheodosopoulosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. State v. KomisarekSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HeathSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  2. State v. HoflandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API