Legal Opinion
State v. Hofland
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 27, 2004No. 2003-265PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C. J.
The defendant, Randall B. Holland, appeals a ruling of the Concord District Court (Sullivan, J.) that he violated a City of Concord parking ordinance. We affirm.
The record supports the following facts. The City of Concord (city) has an ordinance that prohibits parking on city streets for longer than thirty minutes between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. At approximately 4:30 a.m. on October 20, 2002, the defendant received a parking ticket for parking for more than thirty minutes on a downtown city street. Following a bench trial, the defendant was found guilty. This appeal followed. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. BlackmerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. BaderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. StrattonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dalton Hydro LLC v. Town of DaltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. DoddsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.