Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Noland

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1955No. A-5161PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewster

Skinner et al, petitioners, sued Noland et ux, respondents, in trespass to try title, alleging that they were owners in fee simple of 8/57 undivided interest in a tract described as “Beginning at the Southeast corner of Lot No. 16, a stake in channel of Big Mineral Bayous, the same being the Southwest corner of Lot No. 12; thence North 406 varas to a red oak marked X, being 154 varas South of the Northwest corner of Lot No. 12; thence West 345 varas to a rock and a blackjack marked X; thence South 412 varas to the bed of the aforesaid bayou; thence down the channel of said bayou to the place…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pickett v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Curdy v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Matney v. OdomTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. W. T. Carter & Brother v. EwersTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Skinner v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Templeton v. Dreiss, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  2. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Company v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Crosby v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Galerie D'Tile, Inc. v. ShinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Heirs & Unknown Heirs of Barrow v. Champion Paper & Fibre Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API