Skinner v. Noland
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewster
Skinner et al, petitioners, sued Noland et ux, respondents, in trespass to try title, alleging that they were owners in fee simple of 8/57 undivided interest in a tract described as “Beginning at the Southeast corner of Lot No. 16, a stake in channel of Big Mineral Bayous, the same being the Southwest corner of Lot No. 12; thence North 406 varas to a red oak marked X, being 154 varas South of the Northwest corner of Lot No. 12; thence West 345 varas to a rock and a blackjack marked X; thence South 412 varas to the bed of the aforesaid bayou; thence down the channel of said bayou to the place…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pickett v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Curdy v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Matney v. OdomTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- W. T. Carter & Brother v. EwersTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Skinner v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
3Cited by7 opinions
- Templeton v. Dreiss, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Company v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Crosby v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Galerie D'Tile, Inc. v. ShinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Heirs & Unknown Heirs of Barrow v. Champion Paper & Fibre Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.