Legal Opinion

Beaver v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided March 23, 2005No. 03 CV 708PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BRADY, District Judge.

Pending before the court is a motion for summary judgment (doc. 18) filed by the defendant, Exxon Mobil Corporation (“ExxonMobil”). Cory J. Beaver (“plaintiff’) filed an opposition (doc. 23) to which ExxonMobil replied (doc. 24). Plaintiff then filed a supplemental opposition (doc. 29) and ExxonMobil promptly filed a supplemental reply (doc. 32). Also before the court is a motion to strike filed by Exxon-Mobil (doc. 25).

I. BACKGROUND

Prior to the plaintiffs injury, ExxonMo-bil entered into a contract with Fluor Daniel to modify…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. EXHIBITION HALL AUTHORITYSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  2. Thomas v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENTLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Orillion v. Alton Ochsner Medical FoundationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Victor Taylor v. Bobby ArmstrongLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API