Legal Opinion

Orillion v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1996No. 96-CA-494PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JiDUFRESNE, Judge.

This appeal arises following the dismissal of the tort suit of plaintiffs Jason Orillion, *331Barry Orillion, George Orillion on an exception of no cause of action filed by the defendants, Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, (Ochsner), and Brice Building Company (Brice). Both defendants claim they were immune from tort liability on the basis that they were statutory employers. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment in favor of Ochs-ner and Brice, claiming the trial court erred in finding that Ochsner and Brice were immune from tort liability under the “two-contract” statutory…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. White v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Berry v. Holston Well Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  3. Caudle v. BettsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Reis v. Fenasci & SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Freeman v. Moss Well Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beaver v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2005
  2. Christian v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
  3. Frantom v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2021
  4. Orillion v. Alton Ochsner Medical FoundationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API