Petty v. Roberts
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
.Case 10 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT. CITED 101 English O. L. R. 836, Bartlett v. Wells. 104 English O. L. R. 272, DeRoo v. Poster. 27 English C. L. R. 230, Hunt v. Marsey. 10 Peters, 58-76, Tucker v. Moreland. 11 Cush. 40, Merriam v. Cunningham. 10 New Hampshire, 184, Baily y.
Read the full summary
.Case 10 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT. CITED 101 English O. L. R. 836, Bartlett v. Wells. 104 English O. L. R. 272, DeRoo v. Poster. 27 English C. L. R. 230, Hunt v. Marsey. 10 Peters, 58-76, Tucker v. Moreland. 11 Cush. 40, Merriam v. Cunningham. 10 New Hampshire, 184, Baily y. Russell. 26 English Law and Equity, 560, Mawson v. Blane. 11 B. Monroe, 113, Baily v. Bamberger. 7 Cowan, 183, Roof v. Stafford. 1 Bibb, 330, Tandy v. Masterson. 3 Caine’s Reports, 325, Vanwinkle v. Ketchum. 1 Johnson’s Cases, 127, Conrad v. Birdsall. 1 Am. Leading Cases, 258, 259, 4th ed. 1…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PETERS
delivered the opinion or the court.
Appellee (S. F. Roberts) brought this suit in equity against appellants on the 21st of January, 1869, and alleged in his original petition that he, on the 7th of February, 1868, sold by a written agreement sixty acres of land to appellant, Hiram Petty, at the price of two thousand four hundred dollars — one thousand of which was to have been paid in hand at the date of said contract, and for which said Hiram drew an order on Hayden Petty, who was at the time indebted to him in a larger sum than that. He made said order, the writing evidencing the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Darnell v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Franz v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Lexington & Eastern Railway Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Heydrick v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Powell v. KeeneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.