Legal Opinion

McConkey v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 6, 1923No. 24,116PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinión of the court was delivered by

Btjbch, J.:

The action was one by a firm of automobile dis*561tributors to recover a commission for the sale of an automobile made by another firm of distributors. The plaintiffs recovered, and the defendants appeal.

The plaintiffs and the defendants are distributors of the Studebaker automobile, the plaintiffs for Eureka and part of Greenwood county, and the defendant for Wichita and part of Sedgwick county. They receive cars under what is designated “Dealer’s Agreement” with the Studebaker corporation. The agreement contained the following provision…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zellner Mercantile Co. v. Parlin & Orendorff Plow Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southwest Kansas Oil & Gas Co. v. Argus Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. Sage v. Oil Country Specialties Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API