Legal Opinion

Danko v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 12, 1979No. Appeal, No. 1478 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

In this case, Edward A. Danko (claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), which affirmed a referee’s denial of benefits under Section 402(e) of the Unem*389ployment Compensation Law1 for willful misconduct. The only question before us is whether or not the evidence supports the Board’s finding that the claimant was attempting to remove property from his employer ’s premises without permission.

The claimant was observed by a police officer while in the process of removing tires from his employer’s warehouse after working hours.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Geesey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Meneely v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kehde v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Poore v. City of MindenNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Henninger v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Torelli v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Poore v. City of MindenNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API