Legal Opinion

Meneely v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 15, 1977No. Appeal, No. 243 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

James Meneely (claimant) was employed by Wander Sales (employer) for a period of four years as a helper on a delivery truck. Wander Sales sold and delivered appliances and as an additional service for its customers would remove and dispose of the old appliances for a $10 fee. Its established procedure for removing the old appliances was contained in a set of Work Rules given to each employee.1 On February 14, 1974, the claimant and a driver delivered an appliance to a customer. The customer requested that an old appliance be removed which the claimant and driver did.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Owen v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. TumoloCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Peluso v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roach v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Geesey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Williams v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Hammerstone v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Strohecker v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API