Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Carafides
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 7, 1978No. [No. 143, September Term, 1977.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
We shall here hold that a motion to set aside a tax sale decree made out a case of constructive fraud. Accordingly, we shall be obliged to reverse a refusal to reopen a proceeding brought by appellee, Evangelos P. Carafides (Carafides), under Maryland’s tax sale statute, Maryland Code (1957) Art. 81, §§ 70-123, to foreclose the equity of redemption of appellant, Ellen P. Arnold (Mrs. Arnold), in certain land of hers in Montgomery County. 1
The Law
Maryland Rule BS40 provides:
“The procedure for tax sales, including provisions for the order of publication, shall be in accordance with Code,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Citizens Planning & Housing Ass'n v. County ExecutiveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Jannenga v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Hauver v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Thomas v. KolkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Sanchez v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stone v. Chicago Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Pickett v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Canaj, Inc. v. Baker and Division Phase IIICourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Hunter v. BD. OF EDUC., MONT. CNTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Haskell v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.