Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Udy

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1938No. 6430PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIYENS, J.-

Respondent owns the E-|NW¿; W-INEi and the NE-|SW|- in section 28, tp. 13 S. R. 25 E. B. M. on both sides of Cassia Creek which flows generally northeast.

The land lying north of and adjacent to Cassia Creek slopes south and east, the land lying south slopes to the north. Appellants own land to the west and south of respondent on both sides of Cassia Creek. Respondents’ predecessors in interest, in the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for Cassia County, in the case of Darby v. Jones, in 1893, wherein appeared the predecessors in interest of all the parties…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Joyce v. Murphy Land & Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Nielson v. ParkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hutchinson v. Watson Slough Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Van Camp v. EmeryIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Utt v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Joyce Livestock Co. v. United StatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Jenkins v. State, Dept. of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Simonson v. MoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Crow v. CarlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API