Legal Opinion

Munger v. City of Marshalltown

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 18, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Marshall Circuit Court. Action to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, from a fall, caused by a defective sidewalk, of the city. Judgment upon a verdict was rendered for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. The case has before been in this court. See 66 Iowa, 216.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

I. Several objections have been made by plaintiffs’ counsel to the abstract, on the ground that it does not sufficiently show the testimony upon which the case was tried, and that no exceptions were taken to the rulings of the court upon instructions to the jury. We think the abstract, in these respects, is sufficient, and the testimony and rulings of the court are properly presented therein. The objections demand no further attention.

II. The defendant makes divers objections to the rulings of the court below upon instructions given and refused, which we will proceed to consider as fully as…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Langan v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Byerly v. City of AnamosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  3. County Commissioners v. BroadwatersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  4. City of Guthrie v. FinchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  5. Waud v. Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API