Legal Opinion

Alcor Life Extension Foundation v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided May 12, 2010No. 09-1255PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMansfield, J.

This dispute over a decedent’s remains raises significant issues under the Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act, the Final Disposition Act, and Iowa law pertaining to disinterments. See Iowa Code ch. 142C, ch. 144C, § 144.34 (2009). In 2004 Orville Richardson made arrangements with Alcor Life Extension Foundation to take possession of his remains and cryopreserve his head after he passed away. When Orville died in 2009, however, Orville’s relatives did not notify Alcor and instead had him buried. Alcor now appeals the district court’s denial of its request for an order compelling the relatives…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Thompson v. KaczinskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. Kern v. Palmer College of ChiropracticSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  3. Nichols v. City of EvansdaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. In Re the Marriage of ShanksSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  5. Schadendorf v. Snap-On Tools Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Estate of Mary Florence Whalen, Michael WhalenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Office of Citizens' Aide/Ombudsman v. Deb Edwards and Iowa Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. State v. BabcockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. In the Matter of the Estate of Gloria Braner, Nathan Braner and Brandon Braner, Interested Party-Appellants.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2014
  5. In the Matter of the Estate of Mary Florence Whalen, Michael WhalenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API