Legal Opinion

Coker v. Kmeicik

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1935No. 6891PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge GERMAN

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

This case diifers from the case of Walling v. King, County Judge, this day decided (post, p. 446, 87 S. W. (2d) 1074), in this: In the Walling case it was shown that local option was effective in Childress County prior to the adoption of Section 20 of Article 16 of the Constitution of 1919, and the amendment of August 26, 1933, made the sale of beer in said county unlawful until local option, as to beer, had been repealed by the voters of the whole county. In this case it is shown that after the adoption of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griffin v. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Ex Parte FieldsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Walling v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Kimberly v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  5. Adams v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Houchins v. PlainosTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Myers v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Patton v. Texas Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Walling v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Powell v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API