Legal Opinion

Garrison v. Merced

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 30, 1992No. 92-P-1010PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.

At issue in this appeal is whether the failure of a candidate for State representative in a State primary to designate the political party (Democratic) whose nomination he seeks on one of his nomination papers as required by G. L. c. 53, § 45, is fatal to having his name printed on the ballot at the primary election. The State Ballot Law Commission (commission) ruled that, absent proof that the voters who signed the nomination paper were misled, it was not fatal. On appeal from the commission’s decision, the judge in the Superior Court held that the name of the political party was necessary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Teachers Ass'n v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Manning v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Brennan v. Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Capezzuto v. State Ballot Law CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Gibbons v. State Ballot Law CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  2. Marino v. Town CouncilMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001
  3. Sholley v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. Brady v. State Ballot Law CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2020
  5. Coughlin v. Town of SouthbridgeMassachusetts Superior Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API