Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Gardner

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1994No. 23626PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Steffen, J.:

The single issue raised by the appeal and cross-appeal concerns the spousal support awarded by the district court. Appellant/ cross-respondent, Brian Gardner, contends that the lower court abused its discretion in awarding alimony. Respondent/cross-appellant, Ruth Ann Gardner, insists that the spousal award was inadequate both in amount and duration. On this record, we are constrained to agree that Ruth is entitled to additional relief, and accordingly reverse and remand.

FACTS

Brian and Ruth terminated their childless, twenty-seven-year-old marriage on August…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. WaldmanNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Buchanan v. BuchananNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Heim v. HeimNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Shane v. ShaneNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Rutar v. RutarNevada Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shydler v. ShydlerNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Kogod v. Cioffi-KogodNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Gardner v. GardnerNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  4. KLABACKA VS. NELSON C/W 66772Nevada Supreme Court · 2017
  5. KLABACKA VS. NELSON C/W 66772Nevada Supreme Court · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API