Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Gardner

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1994No. 23626Published

1Opinion of the Court

881 P.2d 645 (1994)

Brian GARDNER, Appellant/Cross-Respondent,

v.

Ruth Ann GARDNER, Respondent/Cross-Appellant.

No. 23626.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

September 28, 1994.

Mark A. Jenkin, Las Vegas, for appellant/cross-respondent.

Orin G. Grossman, Las Vegas, for respondent/cross-appellant.

OPINION

STEFFEN, Justice:

The single issue raised by the appeal and cross-appeal concerns the spousal support awarded by the district court. Appellant/cross-respondent, Brian Gardner, contends that the lower court abused its discretion in awarding alimony. Respondent/cross-appellant, Ruth Ann Gardner, insists that the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. WaldmanNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Buchanan v. BuchananNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Heim v. HeimNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Shane v. ShaneNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Rutar v. RutarNevada Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API