Legal Opinion

Rodenburg LLP v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided January 9, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00027Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA EASTERN DIVISION Rodenburg LLP, doing business as ) Rodenburg Law Firm, ) ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S Plaintiff, ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT AND DENYING vs. ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, ) Syndicate No. 4020, subscribing to Policy ) Case No. 3:19-cv-00027 Number DCLPLA 00574-00; and The ) Cincinnati Insurance Company, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ______________________________________________________________________________ Before the Court are cross motions for summary…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. Bonnie Dick v. Dickinson State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API