Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Horen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1892PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to "Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Trespass. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Defendant sbot the plaintiff's dog. Plaintiff brought suit in justice's court, and recovered verdict and judgment for $50. Defendant appealed to the circuit court, where another jury gave him a verdict for $75, and the defendant appealed to this Court. The court below instructed the jury that the defendant was not justified in killing the dog, and that the only question for them to determine was the value of the dog.

1. The charge was correct. The defendant, one morning, saw the dog in front of his house, and found that he *421had left some tracks on his freshly painted porch. He thereupon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Kansas & Arizona Railway Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  2. Dunlap v. SnyderNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Brill & Brill v. FlaglerNew York Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Basye v. HayesIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. McCallister v. SappingfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. McChesney v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Hodges v. CauseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Coleman v. MinorAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API