Kesling v. Mick
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge:
Each of the plaintiffs herein brought a separate suit, praying to have set aside a deed from the defendant Ford Mick to the defendant L. R. Mick. The two causes were consolidated .and heard together in the circuit court. Upon bills, answers, and replications thereto, the court found that the conveyance was voluntary, and without consideration, as to the claims of the two plaintiffs, and canceled and set the same aside as to them.
Each of the bills alleges that the conveyance sought to be set aside was without consideration, and the recital therein as to consideration false,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Trustees of Oberlin College v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
- Neale v. County Court of Wood CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
- Butler v. ThompsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
- Dudley v. BuckleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- Miller v. CorrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Allegheny Development Corp., Inc. v. BaratiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Mullens v. FrazerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
- Rine v. ComptonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
- Hutchinson v. WaltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
- RS CORSON COMPANY v. HartmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959