Legal Opinion

MacAuley Brothers v. Tierney

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 28, 1895PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Bill in Equity for an injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Matteson, C. J..

The complainants-are master plumbers engaged in the business of plumbing. In the transaction of their business they have been accustomed, and are obliged, to purchase from time to time materials from wholesale dealers in Rhode Island and other parts of the United States, and, among others, from L. H. Tilling-hast & Co., of Providence, who with the New England Supply Co. are the only wholesale dealers in plumbing materials in this State.

The respondents are also master plumbers and officers and ! members of the Providence Master Plumbers Association, a - voluntary association…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carew v. RutherfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. HollisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Delz v. Winfree, Norman & PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Robertson v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  5. Payne v. Western & Atlantic RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Di Cristofaro v. Laurel Grove Memorial ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Peoples Security Life Insurance v. HooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Karges Furniture Co. v. Amalgamated Woodworkers Local Union No. 131Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. C. S. Smith Metropolitan Market Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Brown & Allen v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API