Legal Opinion

Winkler v. Hyster Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 10, 1977No. 14022PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

This is another of a series of cases in which an employee eligible to receive or having received workmen’s compensation benefits from his employer nevertheless seeks to recover damages at law from that employer for the same injuries. The theory upon which recovery is sought is known as the “dual purpose doctrine.” It permits recovery by the employee from the employer if the injuries resulted from a breach by the employer of a duty that did not arise out of the employer-employee relationship. (See 2A Larson, Law of Workmen’s Compensation §72.80 (1976).) The theory recognizes that any recovery…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Murphy v. Martin Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Douglas v. E. & J. GALLO WINERYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Weber v. Armco, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Longever v. Revere Copper & Brass Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Caine v. RichardsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Kohr v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Cohn v. Spinks Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API