Legal Opinion

Wolfson v. Succession of Lisso

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1943No. 17931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for the redemption of real estate originally brought by Miss Bessie Wolfson and Mrs. Lena Wolfson Katz, two of the five heirs of Miss Fannie Wolfson, seeking to recover from the Succession of Alex M. Lisso, the following described property, which they alleged to have been illegally transferred to Lisso during his lifetime:

"A certain portion of ground, designated as Lot 3, Block 10, Bernstein Subdivision, in the Parish of Red River, State of Louisiana.
"The following described property, situated in the Parish of Natchitoches, State of Louisiana, being the SE 1/4 of Section 17,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reed v. WarrenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Hanton v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  3. Davis v. Arkansas Southern R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  4. Norton v. Crescent City Ice Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  5. Eichorn v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wolfson v. Lisso's SuccessionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API