Legal Opinion

E-M

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1989No. ID 3113PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3113 MATTER OF E-M- In Adjustment of Status Proceedings Designated by Commissioner May 24, 1989 (1) An applicant seeking temporary resident status under section 245A of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255a (Supp. IV 1986), has the burden to prove his eligibility by a preponderance of the evidence. (2) There is no catch-all definition of the term "preponderance of the evidence." Whether an applicant has submitted sufficient evidence to meet his burden of proof under section 245A of the Act will depend upon the factual circumstances of each case. Generally,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Francis J. Charlton v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. CBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. CHAWATHEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2010
  2. Faustino Santana-Albarran v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. P. SINGHBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
  4. Mohsin Siddiqui v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Z-Noorani, Inc. v. RichardsonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API