Legal Opinion

Jones v. Amrine

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1942No. 35,334PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus whereby petitioner seeks his release from the state penitentiary.

Although the application for the writ is inartistically drawn, it discloses that petitioner is now confined under a judgment of the district court of Geary county finding him guilty of burglary in the second degree, and that petitioner alleges his confinement is illegal for four reasons: (1) That he was not guilty of the crime charged; (2) that he was. never apprised of his constitutional right of trial within the purview of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Eilenbecker v. District Court of Plymouth CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Ohio Ex Rel. Lloyd v. DollisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Howard v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. State v. StephensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. HandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Engels v. AmrineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. Garrison v. AmrineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. Kneisley v. HudspethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  5. Sester v. Belvue Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API