Legal Opinion

Camarota v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 8, 1924No. 3176PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

This writ is urged without a valid assignment of error to support it. Of the several matters argued we shall discuss only the one with reference to which an exception was asked and denied. Feeling that an exception' should have been allowed, we shall consider the question under the rule which permits us, of our own motion, to notice a .plain error not assigned. Rule 11.

The indictment, by four counts, charged that Camarota and Sheck (Í) conspired to commit an offense against the laws of the United States, namely, to receive and conceal liquors unlawfully imported; (2)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Moody v. ReichowWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. United States v. ColonnaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  3. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  4. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  5. Collins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API