Moody v. Reichow
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lincoln county, Neal, J., entered May 3, 1904, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after vacating a default, and a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a mortgage.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
This action was instituted to foreclose a mortgage. The complaint was filed February 15, 1902. On March 7 of the same year, the defendants appeared in the action, and filed a motion to require the plaintiff to give security for costs, on the ground of nonresidence. The motion was confessed by the plaintiff, and on March 27, following, she filed a cost bond, and notified defendants' counsel thereof. A rule of the court provided that the defendants should have ten days, after notice of the filing of the cost bond, to object to the same, or to further plead. No objections were' made, and no…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People's Ice Co. v. SchlenkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Sutton v. GunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Jenkins v. Gamewell Fire Alarm Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Chaffin v. FulkersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
- Grootemaat v. TebelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hammerberg v. LeinertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. DismangCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Nation v. SavelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Spoar v. Turn-VereinWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Bishop v. IllmanWashington Supreme Court · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.