Legal Opinion
Dansby v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided October 2, 1996No. 1108-95PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANTS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
A jury convicted Appellant of involuntary manslaughter and assessed his punishment at confinement for fifty-seven years in the penitentiary. The conviction was affirmed. Dansby v. State, — S.W.2d -, 1995 WL 498725 (Tex.App.—Tyler, No. 12-93-00061-CR, delivered August 23,1995). We granted discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly determined that unrecorded oral statements Appellant made to police officers were admissible under Article 38.22, § 3(c), V.A.C.C.P. We will reverse.
Appellant and three others,…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Santana v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
4Cited by13 opinions
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Zayas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- Guardiola v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- John Joe Amador v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Dorsey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.