Legal Opinion

Almanza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 16, 1992No. 1266-91PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MILLER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of possession of heroin in an amount less than 28 grams. During a pretrial suppression hearing, he moved, pursuant to Article 38.-22, § 3(c) V.A.C.C.P., that an oral confession be excluded from evidence; that request was denied. At trial, the court informed appellant that he would be allowed to appeal the pretrial decision, and appellant pled guilty to the offense. As a repeat offender, he was sentenced to 35 years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Briddle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Timothy Hutchison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
  3. Cameron v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  4. Dorsey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  5. State v. Ortiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API