Legal Opinion

State v. Tomes

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1990No. 18436PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Judge.

• A jury found Willis Ray Tomes guilty of grand theft (auto), I.C. §§ 18-2403(1), 18-2407(1), and the district court imposed a unified sentence of six years in prison with a one-year minimum period of confinement. Tomes appeals from the judgment of conviction, arguing that the trial judge erred by refusing Tomes’ request to instruct the jury that it could consider whether Tomes committed the misdemeanor offense of driving a vehicle without the owner’s consent (joy riding), I.C. § 49-227.

The transcript of the trial reveals the following facts. On May 3, 1989, Tomes and his wife,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. BarrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Sivak v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. NunezIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. LundquistIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BarkerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. RivasIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. PattersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API