Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Zumwalt

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1906No. Sac. No. 1273PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

This is an action in the nature of ejectment, prosecuted by the widow and administratrix of George M. Zumwalt, deceased. The demanded premises consist of four acres of land, upon which are a dwelling-house and other improvements.

In May, 1897, Mrs.- Larkin, who was then the owner of the land, executed and delivered her deed purporting to grant it tó said George M. Zumwalt, and if that deed took effect according to its terms, the plaintiff at the commencement of the action was the owner, and entitled to the possession, of the premises. The adverse claim of the defendant, who is " a brother of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Talbot v. PirkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Hebrew Home for Aged Disabled v. FriedmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Keating v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bassford v. EarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API