Legal Opinion
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Fritsch
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 15, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Proceeding upon the judicial settlement of the accounts of an executor.
1Opinion of the Court
Ketcham, S.
This account is made under a will which is in part as follows:
“First. After my lawful debts are paid I give devise and bequeath unto my beloved husband Joseph Fritsch the bakery and baking business at No. 548 4th Avenue, in the Borough of Brooklyn, N. Y. and I also give, devise and bequeath unto my *252said husband the weekly sum of Twelve Dollars as long as he lives and after his death it is to cease, such weekly sum to begin after my death.
“ Second. All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, real and personal, wheresoever the same is or may be and whatsoever the same shall…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cochrane v. . SchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Jewett v. SchmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Raymond v. Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894
- United States Trust Co. v. MaresiNew York Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ricks v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
- In re the Estate of MatousNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
- Phelps v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1922
- In re the Estate of MossNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930