Legal Opinion

Upper Merion Township v. Bridgeport Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1930No. Appeal, 47PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

A bill was filed in this case praying that defendant borough be restrained from carrying through an attempt to annex certain adjacent territory. After hearing, the court below dismissed the bill and plaintiffs have appealed.

Defendant borough was incorporated by special act of assembly approved February 27, 1851, P. L. 115; it has not accepted the provisions of any of the general acts of assembly relating to boroughs and continues to be governed by its special charter and amendments thereto. In October, 1927, the borough council passed the ordinance here…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Georges Township School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Searight's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Fertig v. PattonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. Directors of the Poor v. Rail-Road Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Poor District Case (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Haverford Township v. SiegleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. CantrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. In re Merger of Lower Turkeyfoot Township School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API