Legal Opinion

Rose ex rel. Carter v. Roberts

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 7, 1900No. 118PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Per curiam

We think this is a proper case in which to stay the issuing a mandate of affirmance pending the decision of the supreme court upon the application for a certiorari, which is now under consideration by that court. If the mandate should now be issued, and it shotdd be decided by the supreme court that the writ of habeas corpus ought not to have been dismissed, the relator would be remediless, as he would have been meantime delivered into the custody of officers in another state, and the writ would necessarily be nugatory, as the respondent could not produce him to be released. It is the right…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. MotlowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
  2. Ex parte HarlanUnited States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida · 1909
  3. Rossi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Tinkoff v. ZerbstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  5. United States v. St. JohnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API