Legal Opinion
Rossi v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1926No. 7333-7335PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
Counsel for the plaintiffs in error in these cases, on notice to the United States District Attorney, presented petitions for the allowance of bail to them. The district attorney answered the petitions, bills of exceptions containing the evidence at the trials were introduced and considered, and counsel for the respective parties presented arguments.
The District Judge for the District of Colorado who tried these cases had granted to each of the petitioners á writ of error from this court, each of them had applied to him for bail during the pendency of the writs of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hudson v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- In Re ClaasenSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Ex parte HarlanUnited States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida · 1909
- McKnight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Hardesty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Williamson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Bridges v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Tinkoff v. ZerbstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.