Hirt v. City of Casper
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Blume, Justice.
This is a condemnation proceeding under the power of eminent domain. The . City of Casper, a city of the first class, seeks to construct a subway underneath the tracks of the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, to be a part of North Center Street, and to take the place of that part of that street which now crosses these tracks. The defendants are abutting property owners on North Center Street, and the city seeks in this proceeding to have their damages assessed which they will sustain by reason of the construction of the subway. Some of the defendants demurred to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Hardy v. SimpsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
- City of Winchester v. RingIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- County of Mercer v. WolffIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. HeissIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barber v. State Highway CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- Liddick v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Wyoming State Highway Department v. NapolitanoWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Western Standard Uranium Company v. ThurstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1960