Legal Opinion

London & Provincial Marine & General Ins. Co. v. Sykes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 1933No. 9188PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Justice.

Appellees, P. R. Sykes, Sr., and P. R. Sykes, Jr., doing business under the name of Sykes-Furniture Company, instituted this suit against R> E. Strong and appellant, London & Provincial Marine & General Insurance Company, Limited, to recover upon an insurance pblicy issued by appellant On fur-' niture sold by appellees to Strong', and insured against loss by fire.

Appellant presents but one proposition, which is ,as follows: “Since the Appel-lees brought this suit in their own right1 against the Insurer and Insured jointly, asserting rights against the Insurer' under a written…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. BarkleyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Trinity Portland Cement Co. v. Lion Bonding & Surety Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Whittington v. Cameron Compress Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Hatt v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Provident Ins. Co. v. LemmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jonathan Paskow, as Trustee v. Calvert Fire Insurance Company, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Republic Insurance Co. v. Silverton Elevators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. J. B. Kramer Grocery Company, Inc. v. Glens Falls Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  4. Travelers Indemnity Company v. Storecraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Freight Terminals, Inc. v. Ryder System, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API