Legal Opinion
State v. Elliott
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 23, 1990No. 88-451PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.
The Superior Court (Nadeau, J.) denied the defendant’s motion to withdraw a guilty plea, which he claimed was involuntary and unintelligent because he had not been advised that the ensuing conviction for driving under the influence, RSA 265:82 (Supp. 1989), would render him immediately liable to be declared a motor vehicle habitual offender, RSA 259:39 (Supp. 1989). We affirm.
In May, 1981, the defendant, Clayton Elliott, was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and in July of the same year was convicted of operating after suspension of his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gene C. Strader v. Sam Garrison, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Derrick Downs-Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Appleby v. RechtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Ottawa v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
- Appleby v. WARDEN, NORTHERN REGIONAL JAILCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- D'AMBROSIO v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. LaforestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.