Legal Opinion

Duane Omar Burnett v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 9, 2018No. 16-995Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-995L Filed October 9, 2018 ) DUANE OMAR BURNETT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Rails-to-Trails; Fifth Amendment ) Takings; National Trails System Act; v. ) Missouri Property Law; Fee Simple; ) Easement; Notice of Interim Trail Use THE UNITED STATES, ) (NITU); Summary Judgment; RCFC 56. ) Defendant. ) ) J. Robert Sears, Attorney of Record, Jacqueline D. Gebhardt, Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for plaintiffs. Lila Jones, Attorney of Record, Edward C. Thomas, Laura Duncan, Jeffrey H. Wood, Acting Assistant Attorney General,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API