Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Parris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1925No. 15848PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This was an action instituted by the defendant in error, G. L. Parris, against the plaintiffs in error, P. M. Kerr, J. M. Gillette, and Carl W. Gillette, to recover a real estate broker’s commission in the sale of certain oil and gas leases.

The petition of the plaintiff alleges his employment by the defendants to find a purchaser for the following described property owned by them:

“An oil and gas lease covering the north half of the northwest quarter of' section 36, township 20, range 8, in Pawnee county, for the sum of $50,000; and,
“An oil and gas lease covering- the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crain v. MilesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Treese v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Wheelan v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. McMillin v. BevesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  5. Matthews v. MountsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Artlin Realty Co. v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Petroleum Pipe Line Co. v. LundySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Eastern MacHinery Co. v. ConroySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API