Kirkham & Woods v. Dupont
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, the Third District. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
Eodman Gibbons was indebted to Freaner and Johnson, by note; to secure it, Eodman Gibbons and William P. Gibbons executed a joint mortgage upon a tract of land held by them in common. Afterward, Eodman Gibbons and one Lamott, his partner, became indebted to Henry Dupont and Alexis Dupont, in the sum of about sixteen thousand dollars, for which they made their note; and to secure it, Eodman Gibbons executed to the Duponts a mortgage upon his undivided interest in the tract of land embraced in the prior mortgage to Johnson and Freaner. This note to Johnson and Freaner not having been paid, they…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Grattan v. WigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Diamond Benefits Life Ins. Co. v. TrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Eldridge v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Railway Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891