Legal Opinion
Starling v. City of Gainesville
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 23, 1925PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.
Ruby Starling joined by her husband, D. F. Starling, sued the City of Gainesville for certain personal injuries to the former caused from running the automobile in which they were riding into an open ditch or excavation which had been dug by defendant in error across one of the public streets of said city thereby throwing the said Ruby Starling against the windshield of said automobile, breaking the said windshield and inflicting on the said Ruby Stalling painful cuts, bruises and injuries.
The case went to trial on the plea of the general issue and contributory negligence on the part of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brash v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Howe v. West Seattle Land & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
- Town of DeFuniak Springs v. PerdueSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
- Janes v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
3Cited by16 opinions
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. BridgemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Mozer v. SemenzaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Barnes v. LiebigSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Wm. G. Roe & Company v. Armour & Company, Armour & Company v. Wm. G. Roe & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- De La Concha v. PineroSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.