Legal Opinion
Blancato v. Randino
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 6, 1993No. 11398PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, rejecting their claims of negligence and loss of consortium.1 The plaintiff contends that the trial court improperly (1) refused to direct a verdict in her favor, and (2) charged the jury that negligence per se is rebuttable by a showing of reasonableness. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On January 9,1988, the plaintiff, Barbara Blancato, and the defendant, Sebastian Randino, were driving their respective vehicles on Ridgewood Road in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Boehm v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Wei Ping Wu v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Sanders v. Officers Club of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Blanchette v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Blancato v. RandinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Pie Plate, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Churchill v. AllessioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Carbone v. City of New BritainConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.