Legal Opinion

Willis v. Willis

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

cited 10 W. Ya. 470; 22 Wall. 576; 2 Par. N. & B. 29, 561; Byl. Bills, 392; 1 Gratt. 234; 8 Gratt. 4; 9 Wall. 13; 2 Wall. 219; 112 IT. S. 139. cited Code, c. 99, s. 11.

1Opinion of the Court

BRANNON, Judge:

H. H. Willis made a negotiable note to Jesse H. Willis, as payee. On its back are found the names of S. 0. Hester, J. H. Willis, EL H. Willis, David Slocum, and E. L. Nixon, indorsed in that order. Jesse H. Willis paid it. He made an assignment of his assets to B. B. Stout, as trustee, for the benefit of creditors; and he and Stout, as trustee, brought a chancery suit against Slocum, as the only solvent party, to make Slocum pay half of what Jesse H. Willis had paid in satisfying said note, on the theory of contribution. David Slocum filed an answer, verified by him, averring…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Ross v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Bier v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Farmers' Bank v. VanmeterCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1826
  5. Hoge v. VintrouxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Elkins v. TompkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Rummel v. YoungWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Schilb v. MoonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Archer v. WardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API