Henderson v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion
Appellant and respondent both petitioned for a rehearing, which was granted, respondent seeking clarification of the opinion to the effect that the new trial be confined to the ninth cause of action, appellant that the new trial be on all five extant causes of action.
Appellant may not complain that at its insistence the trial court compelled respondent to segregate his suit into separate causes of action.
Appellant's objection to respondent's own testimony of the value of contracts of employment which he testified he was prevented from obtaining because these mortgages had not been released…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Freedman v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Harding v. Home Investment & Savings Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Reed v. Order of United Commercial TravelersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Scott v. FieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Jones v. Fidelity Loan & Trust Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.