Rodriguez v. Vallejo
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Justice.
This is an action in trespass to try title. The principal question is whether, under a petition restricted to the formal allegations prescribed in Art. 7366, R.S. 1925 (now Rule 783, Rules of Practice and Procedure in Civil Actions effective September 1, 1941) and an answer of “not guilty” (Art. 7372, now Rule 789), the plaintiff may prove and recover (from the owner of the apparent legal title) upon an equitable title based upon a resulting trust, without specially pleading such title, or the facts constituting the trust.
Much has been written upon this question, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hall v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Texas Creosoting Co. v. Hartburg Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Mayes v. ManningTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Woodall v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Scott v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- Snyder v. Citizens State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Southern Lumber Co. v. Kirby Lumber Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Ellis v. Eden-Birch Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Republic Nat. Bank of Dallas v. EiringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Dismuke v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.