Legal Opinion

Mayes v. Manning

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1889No. 2645PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Freestone. Tried below before Hon. Sam. R. Frost.

1Opinion of the Court

Henry, Associate Justice.—

This is an action of trespass to try *45title commenced on me 6th day of June, 1887, by appellant against his father’s administrator, widow, and children by her, to recover four-hundred acres of land.

Defendants answered by plea of not guilty and ten years statute of limitation.

The case was tried without a jury and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff for one half and for the defendants for the other half of the land.

The record contains the judge’s conclusions of fact, from which it appears—

T. G. Mayes and Catherine G. Boyd were married in Alabama in 1843, and that…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Puckett v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  2. Tanner v. ImleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. McBurney v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Texas Creosoting Co. v. Hartburg Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. McKenzie v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API